SXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 8.78% compared to Sensient Technologies's net margin of -1.23%. Sensient Technologies's return on equity of 11.96% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

Sensient Technologies has a consensus price target of $96.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.19%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sensient Technologies has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Sensient Technologies is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.577, which suggesting that the stock is 42.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.564, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.38%.

Sensient Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Sensient Technologies pays 55.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sensient Technologies quarterly revenues are $392.3M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Sensient Technologies's net income of $34.5M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Sensient Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.11x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 19.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sensient Technologies is 2.55x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green Plains has a net margin of 8.78% compared to Sensient Technologies's net margin of -12.12%. Sensient Technologies's return on equity of 11.96% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -11.81%.

Sensient Technologies has a consensus price target of $96.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.19%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $8.63 which suggests that it could grow by 97.37%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Sensient Technologies, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Sensient Technologies.

Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.577, which suggesting that the stock is 42.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.693%.

Sensient Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sensient Technologies pays 55.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Sensient Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sensient Technologies quarterly revenues are $392.3M, which are smaller than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $601.5M. Sensient Technologies's net income of $34.5M is higher than Green Plains's net income of -$72.9M. Notably, Sensient Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.11x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sensient Technologies is 2.55x versus 0.12x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 8.78% compared to Sensient Technologies's net margin of --. Sensient Technologies's return on equity of 11.96% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Sensient Technologies has a consensus price target of $96.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.19%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 185.71%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Sensient Technologies, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Sensient Technologies.

Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.577, which suggesting that the stock is 42.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.74%.

Sensient Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sensient Technologies pays 55.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sensient Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sensient Technologies quarterly revenues are $392.3M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Sensient Technologies's net income of $34.5M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Sensient Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.11x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sensient Technologies is 2.55x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 8.78% compared to Sensient Technologies's net margin of --. Sensient Technologies's return on equity of 11.96% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Sensient Technologies has a consensus price target of $96.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.19%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 149.5%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Sensient Technologies, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Sensient Technologies.

Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.577, which suggesting that the stock is 42.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.16%.

Sensient Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sensient Technologies pays 55.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sensient Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sensient Technologies quarterly revenues are $392.3M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Sensient Technologies's net income of $34.5M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Sensient Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.11x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sensient Technologies is 2.55x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.